I hope all the homophobes in Texas (and there are a lot of 'em, hoo-boy) are breathing a huge sigh of relief today that they successfully thwarted a hostile takeover of their state by raving "homosexuals" hell-bent on getting married and....what?
I wonder how "opposite" these opposite sex marriages have to be to be legitimated under the constitution? When pressed, how would they define what a "man" and a "woman" is? As we all know, gender and sexuality are on fluid continuums, and to a large extent so is biological sex. There is a lot of ambiguity lurking underneath this idea of distinct biological sexes. What we need is someone with ambigous genitalia to sue the state of Texas (or any one of the other 19-odd states that have this in their constitutions now) for denying her/him the right to marry. Heh heh. I can already see the blank confused looks on the faces of legislators.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment